#Login Register
Watch Ergonomics
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


02-26-2016, 09:13 PM #1
CubicalProductions Ambassador

Status: Offline Threads/Posts:1/4 Joined:Dec 2015
This question is more for the designers of BLOCKS, but everyone is as always free to express their concerns and opinions given that they do so with respect to everyone involved on this thread.

* * *

I've noticed from many of the design pictures that the the modules appear rigid and inflexible. As a result, I get a slight impression that the smartwatch may seen more like a rigid functioning handcuff on the wrist of the user. I do know, however, that they are designing the final adjustment module to be adaptable to a variety of wrist sizes.

Has anyone on the staff done a long term ergonomics test? Has any watch prototype been worn through an entire day and/or over multiple days and tested for comfort? Does the watch shift around on the wrist of the user a lot, or does it stay in place like any watch with an adjustable wrist band?

This concern mostly comes for the feel of the product. I remember as a kid when we used to have these "spy" watches that were really bulky and loose-fitting. The toy tended to jump around on my wrist a lot and feel very cheap. I have complete faith that the designers planned the concept with ergonomics in mind. Just don't make one of the most advanced pieces of consumer technology in the world feel like a Fisher Price toy on my wrist.

The only reason this takes priority for me is because I'm pretty sure that the designers have the hardware and software down to a science, so the fact that I'm discussing ergonomics means that the BLOCKS team have done a mighty fine job of everything else so far. This is just one detail I'd like to have down.

* * *

Thank you, everyone!
Seth M, Director
Cubical Productions

03-03-2016, 08:13 AM #2
ExperiencedTTLPhotog Film Photographer Par Excellence

Status: Offline Threads/Posts:0/6 Joined:Feb 2016
Ergonomics is very hard to calculate... Each and every person has differing dementions, so ergonomics has to be based on a median, or average. In a normal watch, using a meterial such as poly, leather, or rubber allows for the different shapes, since they will conform to a users wrist; with metal links, they are either designed as small as can be, or multi-faceted as can be. When you introduce a standard size, as the modules are (minus the current battery module of course), the amount of time spent on design and ergonomics increases.
For example, my Bulova 96A113, which has a leather band, fits slightly differently than my bulova 96A109, which has a stainless steal(ss) band. The two watch faces are exactly the same, the only difference is the band material. Same way my Bulova 92A93 fits differently than my 96A109, even though both have ss bands.

03-07-2016, 01:08 PM #3
BlocksDC New Member

Status: Offline Threads/Posts:1/5 Joined:Jan 2016
I have been thinking about this recently as well. The photos of the prototype modules seem chunkier than I imagined. I assume design aspects will be tweaked as we get closer to September, but do we think the size of the modules is pretty much set?
For me it probably isn't a big deal. I'm a 6'1" 200lbs guy. But it would probably look really odd on my 5'1" 100lbs wife. Not to mention I doubt it would be very comfortable for her.

03-07-2016, 01:32 PM #4
Neil Shah KS Comment Guru

Status: Offline Threads/Posts:8/115 Joined:Jan 2016
Don't worry guys the prototypes are just 3D printed and not how the actual production unit will look or feel like. I am sure the watch will be streamlined before it's delivered to us.







Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)